
Ultimate access to all questions.
Deep dive into the quiz with AI chat providers.
We prepare a focused prompt with your quiz and certificate details so each AI can offer a more tailored, in-depth explanation.
A data analyst uses Amazon Bedrock to generate financial summaries from quarterly reports. Sometimes, the model produces vague answers. What should the analyst do to improve the output quality?
A
Use a shorter prompt
B
Add clearer instructions and define output format
C
Randomize wording for creativity
D
Reduce temperature to zero
Explanation:
Explanation:
When using Amazon Bedrock or any generative AI model, vague outputs often result from insufficiently detailed prompts. To improve output quality:
Clearer instructions: Provide specific guidance on what information to extract, what format to use, and what level of detail is expected.
Define output format: Specify exactly how the financial summary should be structured (e.g., bullet points, tables, specific sections).
Context and examples: Including examples of desired outputs can significantly improve model performance.
Why other options are incorrect:
A) Use a shorter prompt: Shorter prompts typically provide less context and guidance, which would likely make outputs even more vague.
C) Randomize wording for creativity: Randomization introduces inconsistency and unpredictability, which is counterproductive for structured financial summaries.
D) Reduce temperature to zero: While lowering temperature can make outputs more deterministic, it doesn't address the core issue of vague instructions. Temperature controls randomness, not clarity of instructions.
Best Practice: When working with Amazon Bedrock, use prompt engineering techniques like:
Providing clear role definitions ("You are a financial analyst...")
Specifying exact output formats
Including examples of good vs. bad outputs
Using system prompts to set context and constraints