
Ultimate access to all questions.
Deep dive into the quiz with AI chat providers.
We prepare a focused prompt with your quiz and certificate details so each AI can offer a more tailored, in-depth explanation.
A journalism startup wants accurate yet slightly human-sounding article summaries. Which parameter pair is ideal?
A
temperature 0.3 & top-p 0.4
B
temperature 0.7 & top-p 0.9
Explanation:
For generating accurate yet slightly human-sounding article summaries, the ideal parameter pair is temperature 0.3 & top-p 0.4.
Temperature (0.0-1.0+):
Lower temperature (0.0-0.5): More deterministic, focused, and accurate outputs
Higher temperature (0.5-1.0+): More creative, diverse, and random outputs
Top-p (0.0-1.0):
Lower top-p (0.0-0.5): More focused sampling from the most probable tokens
Higher top-p (0.5-1.0): More diverse sampling from a broader range of tokens
Temperature 0.3 provides enough creativity to sound slightly human while maintaining accuracy
Top-p 0.4 ensures the model focuses on the most probable tokens for factual accuracy
This combination balances factual precision with natural language flow
Temperature 0.7 is too high for journalism summaries - it would introduce too much randomness and potential inaccuracies
Top-p 0.9 is too broad, allowing too many low-probability tokens that could compromise factual accuracy
Use lower temperature values (0.2-0.4) for factual accuracy
Use moderate top-p values (0.3-0.5) to maintain focus while allowing some natural variation
The goal is to produce summaries that are factually precise but not robotic-sounding