Answer-first summary for fast verification
Answer: Attributing her superior returns to participation in the CFA Program
## Explanation **Correct Answer: B** - Attributing her superior returns to participation in the CFA Program **Analysis:** 1. **Nonpayment of CFA Institute membership dues (Option A):** This is not a violation of the Standards of Professional Conduct. While CFA Institute members are required to pay dues to maintain membership, failure to pay dues due to financial hardship is not considered a violation of professional standards. The Standards focus on professional conduct, not administrative matters like dues payment. 2. **Attributing her superior returns to participation in the CFA Program (Option B):** This is the most likely violation. According to Standard VII(B) - Reference to CFA Institute, the CFA Designation, and the CFA Program, members and candidates must not make promotional promises or guarantees that the CFA designation will result in superior performance or investment results. By stating that the CFA Program "enabled her to achieve superior returns on behalf of her clients," Nilsson is implying that the CFA designation guarantees superior performance, which is prohibited. 3. **Indicating that being a CFA charterholder has enhanced her portfolio management skills (Option C):** This is generally acceptable. Members can state that the CFA Program has enhanced their skills and knowledge, as long as they don't imply it guarantees superior performance. This statement is factual and doesn't make performance promises. **Key Standards Violated:** - **Standard VII(B): Reference to CFA Institute, the CFA Designation, and the CFA Program** - Specifically, the prohibition against implying that the CFA designation results in superior performance or investment results. **Additional Context:** - Nilsson's statement about being a CFA charterholder up until two years ago is accurate and not misleading, as she was indeed a charterholder before her membership lapsed due to nonpayment of dues. - The statement about enhanced skills is permissible as it's a factual statement about skill development. - Only the performance attribution statement crosses the line into prohibited promotional claims.
Author: LeetQuiz .
Ultimate access to all questions.
No comments yet.
Pia Nilsson is a sole proprietor investment advisor. An economic recession has reduced the number of clients she advises and caused revenues to decline. As a result, Nilsson has not paid her CFA Institute membership dues for the past two years. When a national financial publication recently interviewed Nilsson, she indicated that up until two years ago she had been a CFA charterholder and a CFA Institute member in good standing. In addition, she stated the completion of the CFA Program enhanced her portfolio management skills and enabled her to achieve superior returns on behalf of her clients. Which of Nilsson's following actions most likely violated the CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct?
A
Nonpayment of CFA Institute membership dues
B
Attributing her superior returns to participation in the CFA Program
C
Indicating that being a CFA charterholder has enhanced her portfolio management skills