
Explanation:
A. Correct because behavioral explanations for value anomalies, presenting the anomalies as mispricing rather than compensation for increased risk. These studies recognize the emotional factors involved in appraising stocks. The halo effect, for example, extends a favorable evaluation of some characteristics to other characteristics. A company with a good growth record and good previous share price performance might be seen as a good investment, with higher expected returns than its risk characteristics merit. This view is a form of representativeness that can lead investors to extrapolate recent past performance into expected returns. Overconfidence can also be involved in predicting growth rates, potentially leading growth stocks to be overvalued B. Incorrect because the loss-aversion bias refers to the tendency to strongly prefer avoiding losses to achieving gains. The loss-aversion bias is also known as the disposition effect: the holding of investments that have experienced losses too long, and the selling of investments that have experienced gains too quickly (i.e., holding on to losers and selling winners). Hence, the disposition effect does not contribute to an explanation of the value stock anomaly. C. Incorrect because the framing bias is an information-processing bias in which a person answers a question differently based on the way in which it is asked or framed. It is often possible to frame a given decision problem in more than one way. Further, as a result of framing bias, FMPs (financial market participants) may do the following: Misidentify risk tolerances because of how questions about risk tolerance were framed, becoming more risk-averse when presented with a gain frame of reference and more risk-seeking when presented with a loss frame of reference. This misidentification may result in suboptimal portfolios. Focus on short-term price fluctuations, which may result in long-run considerations being ignored in the decision making process. Hence, the effects of the framing bias do not contribute to an explanation of the value stock anomaly. The Behavioral Biases of Individuals • describe how behavioral biases of investors can lead to market characteristics that may not be explained by traditional finance
Ultimate access to all questions.
Which of the following provides the best behavioral explanation of the value stock anomaly?
A
The halo effect
B
The disposition effect
C
The effects of the framing bias
No comments yet.