
Explanation:
In an investment policy statement (IPS), constraints are typically categorized into several types:
Let's analyze each option:
A. An investor's tax status - This is a tax constraint, not a legal/regulatory constraint. Tax status affects investment decisions (e.g., tax-exempt vs. taxable accounts, capital gains considerations), but it's not a legal requirement imposed by regulators.
B. A pension fund's self-investment limit - This is a legal and regulatory constraint. Pension funds are subject to specific regulations that limit how much they can invest in their own company's securities or related entities. These limits are imposed by regulatory bodies to ensure diversification and protect beneficiaries.
C. An investor's desire to avoid investments in the gambling industry - This is a unique circumstance or ethical constraint. It reflects personal values or preferences, not a legal requirement.
Key Distinction:
Therefore, option B is the correct answer as it represents a constraint imposed by legal or regulatory authorities on pension funds.
Ultimate access to all questions.
With respect to an investment policy statement, which of the following is best classified as a legal and regulatory constraint?
A
An investor's tax status
B
A pension fund's self-investment limit
C
An investor's desire to avoid investments in the gambling industry
No comments yet.