Answer-first summary for fast verification
Answer: Ownership.
## Detailed Explanation **Correct Answer: B (Ownership)** ### Why Ownership is the Correct Answer: 1. **Material Conflict of Interest**: Ortiz owns stock in Continental Wheat from his previous employment compensation. This ownership creates a material conflict of interest that must be disclosed to clients before making investment recommendations. 2. **Violation of Standard VI(A) - Disclosure of Conflicts**: According to CFA Institute Standard VI(A) - Disclosure of Conflicts, members must make full and fair disclosure of all matters that could reasonably be expected to impair their independence and objectivity or interfere with respective duties to clients, prospective clients, and employer. Ortiz failed to disclose his stock ownership. 3. **Violation of Standard I(B) - Independence and Objectivity**: Ortiz's ownership of Continental stock could reasonably be expected to impair his independence and objectivity in analyzing and recommending the stock. ### Why Other Options are Incorrect: - **A (Research)**: While Ortiz conducted research, the primary violation is not about the quality or methodology of his research, but about his failure to disclose a material conflict of interest stemming from his stock ownership. - **C (Recommendation)**: The recommendation itself might be questionable given the subsequent price drop, but the core ethical violation is the failure to disclose his ownership interest before making the recommendation. ### Key Points: - Ortiz worked for Continental five years ago and received stock as compensation - He still owns this stock - He did not disclose this ownership to clients - He recommended the stock to clients with moderate risk tolerance - The stock subsequently dropped 50% after poor earnings announcement ### Relevant CFA Standards: - **Standard VI(A) - Disclosure of Conflicts**: Requires disclosure of all matters that could reasonably be expected to impair independence and objectivity - **Standard I(B) - Independence and Objectivity**: Requires members to maintain independence and objectivity - **Standard V(A) - Diligence and Reasonable Basis**: While not the primary violation, Ortiz may have violated this if his research was not thorough enough to anticipate the earnings decline **Conclusion**: Ortiz violated the CFA Institute Code of Ethics primarily by failing to disclose his ownership interest in Continental Wheat, which created a material conflict of interest that should have been disclosed to clients before making investment recommendations.
Author: LeetQuiz .
Ultimate access to all questions.
Raymond Ortiz, CFA, provides investment advice to high-net-worth investors. Ortiz has just completed an analysis of Continental Wheat, a manufacturer of wheat-based food products. He rated the company a long-term hold for investors seeking growth and income. Ortiz's analysis included a review of the company's management team, financial data, pro forma financial positions, dividends and dividend policy, and a comparison of Continental with its competitors. Although he does not tell anyone, five years ago, Ortiz worked for and managed the commodities derivatives trading unit of Continental. As part of his compensation at Continental, he received stock, which he still owns. Based upon his research, Ortiz recommends Continental to clients who have a moderate risk tolerance. Two weeks later Continental announces its quarterly earnings are 30% less than a year ago. Consequently, shares of Continental drop by 50%. Ortiz most likely violated the CFA Institute Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct related to his stock:
A
Research.
B
Ownership.
C
Recommendation.
No comments yet.