
Explanation:
Michael Cane has violated the Standard relating to loyalty, prudence, and care for both reasons:
Under CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct, investment managers have a fiduciary duty to vote proxies in the best interests of their clients. The Standard III(A) - Loyalty, Prudence, and Care requires that members and candidates:
Voting proxies is a fundamental responsibility of investment managers, as proxy votes can significantly impact shareholder value and corporate governance. The policy stating that "voting proxies may not be required in all instances if they do not benefit clients" directly violates this standard.
Under Standard V(B) - Communication with Clients and Prospective Clients, investment managers must:
By disclosing the proxy voting policy only upon request, Cane fails to meet the requirement for proactive disclosure.
Both aspects of Cane's policy violate CFA Institute Standards. Investment managers must:
Therefore, option C is correct - Cane has violated the Standard for both reasons.
Ultimate access to all questions.
No comments yet.
Michael Cane, CFA, is an investment manager. Cane's proxy voting policy includes a provision that voting proxies may not be required in all instances if they do not benefit clients. The proxy voting policy is disclosed to his clients only upon request. Has Cane most likely violated the Standard relating to loyalty, prudence and care?
A
Yes, only because the voting of proxies is required in all instances
B
Yes, only because the proxy voting policy is disclosed to his clients only upon request
C
Yes, both because the voting of proxies is required in all instances and because the proxy voting policy is disclosed to his clients only upon request