
Answer-first summary for fast verification
Answer: the acquirer would theoretically be willing to pay more than another acquirer with a lower tax rate.
## Explanation When a profitable acquirer acquires a target company with tax loss carryforwards, the value of those tax loss carryforwards depends on the acquirer's tax rate. Here's why: 1. **Tax loss carryforwards** allow a company to reduce its future taxable income, thereby reducing future tax payments. 2. **Value of tax shield** = Tax loss carryforward × Tax rate - The higher the tax rate, the greater the tax savings from using the tax loss carryforwards. 3. **Acquisition pricing**: A profitable acquirer with a higher tax rate would value the tax loss carryforwards more highly than an acquirer with a lower tax rate, because: - Higher tax rate → Higher tax savings per dollar of tax loss carryforward - Therefore, the acquirer with the higher tax rate would be willing to pay more for the target company 4. **Option B is correct**: The acquirer would theoretically be willing to pay more than another acquirer with a lower tax rate because the tax loss carryforwards are more valuable to the acquirer with the higher tax rate. 5. **Option A is incorrect**: The current tax rate does impact the acquisition price because it determines the value of the tax loss carryforwards. 6. **Option C is incorrect**: This is the opposite of the correct relationship. An acquirer with a higher tax rate would value the tax loss carryforwards more, not less. **Key takeaway**: In mergers and acquisitions, tax considerations are important. Tax loss carryforwards are more valuable to acquirers with higher tax rates because they generate greater tax savings.
Author: LeetQuiz .
Ultimate access to all questions.
Which of the following statements about the acquisition of a target company with tax loss carryforwards is most accurate? If the acquirer is profitable:
A
its current tax rate will have no impact on the acquisition price.
B
the acquirer would theoretically be willing to pay more than another acquirer with a lower tax rate.
C
the acquirer would theoretically be willing to pay more than another acquirer with a higher tax rate.
No comments yet.