
Explanation:
Step-by-step calculation:
Calculate the growth rate (g):
Calculate next year's dividend (D₁):
$3.60$3.60 × (1 + 0.072) = $3.60 × 1.072 = $3.8592Apply the Gordon growth model formula:
$3.8592 / (0.15 - 0.072) = $3.8592 / 0.078 = $49.4769 ≈ $49.48Wait, this gives approximately $49.48, which is closest to option C ($49.49). Let me double-check:
Actually, looking at the options:
$36.96$46.15$49.49My calculation gives $49.48, which is closest to option C. However, let me verify if there's a different interpretation:
Alternative calculation (using D₀ instead of D₁):
Some might incorrectly use: V₀ = D₀ × (1 + g) / (r - g) = $3.60 × 1.072 / 0.078 = $3.8592 / 0.078 = $49.48
Another common mistake: Using D₀/(r-g) = $3.60/0.078 = $46.15 (option B)
Correct approach: The Gordon growth model uses next year's dividend (D₁), not current dividend (D₀). So:
D₁ = D₀ × (1 + g) = $3.60 × 1.072 = $3.8592
V₀ = D₁/(r-g) = $3.8592/0.078 = $49.4769 ≈ $49.48
Therefore, the correct answer is C ($49.49).
Why others might choose wrong options:
$36.96): Might have used wrong growth rate or calculation error$46.15): Used current dividend D₀ instead of next year's dividend D₁: $3.60/0.078 = $46.15Final answer: C
Ultimate access to all questions.
No comments yet.
An analyst gathers the following data to value the shares of a company:
| ROE | 12% |
|---|---|
| Dividend payout ratio | 40% |
| Required rate of return on shares | 15% |
| Current year's dividend per share | $3.60 |
Using the Gordon growth model, the intrinsic value per share is closest to:
A
$36.96.
B
$46.15.
C
$49.49.