
Explanation:
Greenfield projects are considered high-risk infrastructure investments because:
Construction risk: These projects involve building new infrastructure from scratch, which carries risks of delays, cost overruns, and technical challenges.
Demand risk: The question specifically mentions "without guarantees of demand upon completion," meaning there's uncertainty about whether the completed project will generate sufficient revenue.
Regulatory and political risk: New projects often face regulatory hurdles and political uncertainties.
Financing risk: Greenfield projects typically require significant upfront capital investment with uncertain returns.
Comparison with other options:
Option A (An asset with a history of steady cash flows): This represents a low-risk investment as it has proven revenue generation.
Option B (A brownfield asset leased back to a government): Brownfield assets are existing infrastructure projects, and a leaseback arrangement with a government provides stable, predictable cash flows, making this a lower-risk investment.
Key takeaway: In infrastructure investing, greenfield projects are generally considered higher risk than brownfield projects due to the uncertainties involved in construction, demand, and initial operations.
Ultimate access to all questions.
Which of the following is most likely a high-risk infrastructure investment?
A
An asset with a history of steady cash flows
B
A brownfield asset leased back to a government
C
A greenfield project without guarantees of demand upon completion
No comments yet.