Explanation

Correct Answer: C

Empirical duration is indeed estimated using historical data in statistical models that incorporate various factors affecting bond prices. This approach differs from analytical duration (also called modified duration or Macaulay duration), which is calculated using mathematical formulas based on the bond's cash flows and yield.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A: This statement is incorrect. Empirical duration does not assume that government bond yields and spreads are uncorrelated. In fact, empirical duration models often explicitly account for correlations between different factors affecting bond prices.

B: This statement is not necessarily true. While empirical duration can provide valuable insights, it's not universally "more accurate" than analytical duration for government bonds. The accuracy depends on the specific context:

• Analytical duration works well for option-free bonds with parallel yield curve shifts
• Empirical duration can capture more complex relationships but is subject to model risk and data limitations
• For government bonds, analytical duration is often quite reliable and widely used

Key differences between empirical and analytical duration:

Empirical duration is particularly useful for bonds with embedded options or complex structures where analytical duration may not fully capture price sensitivity.