
Ultimate access to all questions.
A social media company wants to use a large language model (LLM) for content moderation. The company wants to evaluate the LLM outputs for bias and potential discrimination against specific groups or individuals. Which data source should the company use to evaluate the LLM outputs with the LEAST administrative effort?
Explanation:
Correct Answer: D. Benchmark datasets
Why Benchmark Datasets are the best choice:
Pre-existing and standardized: Benchmark datasets are specifically designed and curated for evaluating AI models, including LLMs, for bias and fairness. They are readily available and don't require the company to create their own evaluation data.
Minimal administrative effort: Using benchmark datasets requires the least administrative effort because:
Comprehensive bias evaluation: Benchmark datasets are specifically designed to test for various types of bias and discrimination across different demographic groups, making them ideal for the company's purpose.
Why the other options are not optimal:
A. User-generated content: This would require significant administrative effort to collect, clean, annotate, and prepare for evaluation. It's not standardized and may not cover all the bias scenarios the company wants to test.
B. Moderation logs: While these contain historical moderation decisions, they would need extensive processing to extract relevant patterns and may reflect existing biases in the current moderation system.
C. Content moderation guidelines: These are policy documents, not data sources for evaluating LLM outputs. They could inform what to look for but don't provide actual data for testing.
Key Takeaway: When evaluating AI models for bias and fairness, benchmark datasets provide the most efficient and standardized approach with minimal administrative overhead, as they are specifically designed for this purpose and come with established evaluation protocols.