
Explanation:
Let's analyze each option:
Option A: SELECT count(member_id) FROM my_table;
COUNT() function in SQL excludes NULL values by default.Option B: SELECT count(member id)-count null(member_id) FROM my_table;
member id should be member_id (missing underscore)count null() is not a valid SQL functionOption C: SELECT count_if(member_id IS NULL) FROM my_table; ✓ CORRECT
count_if() is a Spark SQL function that counts rows where the condition is true.member_id IS NULL correctly identifies null values.Option D: SELECT null member_jd) FROM my_table;
member_jd appears to be a typo (should be member_id)null is not a functionOption E: SELECT count null(member id) FROM my_table;
member id should be member_id (missing underscore)count null() is not a valid SQL functioncount_if() or use COUNT(*) with a WHERE clauseIn Spark SQL, you could also use:
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM my_table WHERE member_id IS NULL;SELECT SUM(CASE WHEN member_id IS NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) FROM my_table;COUNT(column_name) excludes NULL valuesCOUNT(*) counts all rows including NULLscount_if(condition) counts rows where the condition evaluates to TRUEIS NULL is the correct operator to check for null values in SQLUltimate access to all questions.
No comments yet.
Which of the following commands will return the number of null values in the member_id column?
A
SELECT count(member_id) FROM my_table;
B
SELECT count(member id)-count null(member_id) FROM my_table;
C
SELECT count_if(member_id IS NULL) FROM my_table;
D
SELECT null member_jd) FROM my_table;
E
SELECT count null(member id) FROM my_table;