
Ultimate access to all questions.
In order to prevent accidental commits to production data, a senior data engineer has instituted a policy that all development work will reference clones of Delta Lake tables. After testing both DEEP and SHALLOW CLONE, development tables are created using SHALLOW CLONE.
A few weeks after initial table creation, the cloned versions of several tables implemented as Type 1 Slowly Changing Dimension (SCD) stop working. The transaction logs for the source tables show that VACUUM was run the day before.
Which statement describes why the cloned tables are no longer working?
A
Because Type 1 changes overwrite existing records, Delta Lake cannot guarantee data consistency for cloned tables.
B
Running VACUUM automatically invalidates any shallow clones of a table; DEEP CLONE should always be used when a cloned table will be repeatedly queried.
C
Tables created with SHALLOW CLONE are automatically deleted after their default retention threshold of 7 days.
D
The metadata created by the CLONE operation is referencing data files that were purged as invalid by the VACUUM command.
E
The data files compacted by VACUUM are not tracked by the cloned metadata; running REFRESH on the cloned table will pull in recent changes.
Explanation:
Correct Answer: D
Why D is correct:
Why other options are incorrect:
A: Type 1 SCD behavior (overwriting existing records) doesn't inherently prevent Delta Lake from maintaining consistency for cloned tables. This is unrelated to the VACUUM issue.
B: VACUUM doesn't automatically invalidate shallow clones. The issue is that VACUUM removes data files that shallow clones depend on, not that it invalidates them automatically.
C: SHALLOW CLONE tables are not automatically deleted after 7 days. The 7-day reference is likely confusing it with the default retention period for VACUUM.
E: Running REFRESH won't help because the data files have been physically deleted. REFRESH updates metadata but cannot recreate deleted data files.
Key Learning Points: