
Explanation:
Correct Answer: D - AWS Storage Gateway Volume Gateway cached volumes
Why this is correct:
Why other options are incorrect:
A. Amazon S3 File Gateway - This provides file-based access to Amazon S3 through NFS or SMB protocols, but doesn't provide iSCSI block storage access that the company needs for their application servers.
B. AWS Storage Gateway Tape Gateway - This is for backup/archive scenarios, presenting virtual tape libraries to backup applications, not for primary storage access via iSCSI.
C. AWS Storage Gateway Volume Gateway stored volumes - This stores the entire dataset locally on-premises and asynchronously backs it up to AWS. This would NOT minimize on-premises storage needs since all data is stored locally.
Key AWS Storage Gateway types comparison:
This solution allows the company to maintain iSCSI access for their application servers while reducing their on-premises storage footprint.
Ultimate access to all questions.
A company that primarily runs its application servers on premises has decided to migrate to AWS. The company wants to minimize its need to scale its Internet Small Computer Systems Interface (iSCSI) storage on premises. The company wants only its recently accessed data to remain stored locally.
Which AWS solution should the company use to meet these requirements?
A
Amazon S3 File Gateway
B
AWS Storage Gateway Tape Gateway
C
AWS Storage Gateway Volume Gateway stored volumes
D
AWS Storage Gateway Volume Gateway cached volumes
No comments yet.