
Ultimate access to all questions.
Explanation:
Statement (b) is false, which makes it the correct answer. Covered Interest Rate Parity (CIRP) has indeed failed, and violations (a non-zero cross-currency basis) have been persistently observed post-GFC in both FX swaps and cross-currency swaps.
The other statements highlight accurate differences between the two:
No comments yet.
A
a) An FX swap is typically a shorter-term instrument while a cross-currency swap is a longer-term instrument (typically above one year)
B
b) Covered interest rate parity (CIRP) cannot fail (i.e., cannot be violated) in the case of an FX swap, while CIRP cannot even be tested on a cross-currency swap because the final exchange uses the initial spot rate
C
c) At maturity, the FX swap has the counterparties repay the borrowed amounts at the pre-agreed forward rate, but the cross-currency swap exchanges the borrowed amounts as the initial spot rate
D
d) The FX swap typically has only two cash flow legs (i.e., initially simultaneous lending and then repayment at maturity), but the cross-currency swap exchanges several interim interest payments