
Explanation:
Correct Answer: C
To find the probability that the market factor ends up at a quantile (or worse) associated with a portfolio loss of 0.01, we need to solve for the market factor return threshold () and then find its cumulative probability using the standard normal cumulative distribution function .
Given the formula:
We are given the following values:
Substituting these values into the equation:
We know that .
0.80 \bar{m} = -2.3263 + 1.39578 $$ $$0.80` \bar{m} = -0.93052 \bar{m} = \frac{-0.93052}{0.80} = -1.16315 $$
Now, we find the probability that the market factor is at this quantile or worse by applying the cumulative normal distribution function:
Looking up the standard normal distribution, , or $12.24%$.
(Note: If we use the exact value -2.33 from the prompt throughout the calculation:
$0.8\bar{m} = -2.33 + 1.398 = -0.932 \bar{m} = -1.165 \Phi(-1.165) \approx 0.1220 $, which is still closest to option C).
Ultimate access to all questions.
No comments yet.
311.1. Employing a single-factor model for the Credit VaR of a portfolio, Malz⁵ relates the market factor return (m) to a stated level of portfolio loss, in this case, 0.010:
For example, a loss of 0.01 or worse:
If the default probability is 1.0%, such that , and the correlation is 0.64, such that , which is nearest to the probability that the portfolio loss is 0.01 or worse; i.e., the probability that the market factor ends up at a quantile, or worse, associated with a portfolio loss of 0.01?
A
1.75%
B
5.83%
C
12.24%
D
29.00%