
Explanation:
The global financial crisis of 2007-2009 exposed the inadequacy of the minimum capital charges under the market risk amendment in addressing the underlying trading-book risks. In response to this, the Basel Committee introduced several changes, one of which was the inclusion of a stressed VaR component in the VaR computations. This change was aimed at ensuring that the VaR calculations took into account extreme market conditions, thereby providing a more accurate measure of the potential losses that could be incurred in such scenarios. This change was part of a broader set of reforms known as Basel 2.5, which were designed to strengthen the resilience of the banking sector and reduce the likelihood of future financial crises.
Choice B is incorrect. Operational risk, while important, was not the primary focus of Basel 2.5 amendments. The changes were primarily aimed at addressing trading book risks and did not mandate additional operational risk coverage on top of credit and market risk.
Choice C is incorrect. While modernizing credit risk measures and aligning them with banks’ internal measures is a crucial aspect of overall risk management, it was not a specific change implemented under Basel 2.5 to address trading book risks.
Choice D is incorrect. The classification of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital for preservation of maintenance or recapitalization purposes does not directly relate to the changes made in Basel 2.5 for addressing trading book risks.
Ultimate access to all questions.
No comments yet.
Q.4285 After the global financial crisis, it was realized that the minimum capital charges under the market risk amendment were not sufficient to address trading book risks. Which of the following is one of the significant changes implemented in 2011 to address these trading book risks, which was later known as Basel 2.5?
A
VaR computation was tailored to include a stressed VaR component
B
A portion of operational risk was required on top of credit and market risk
C
The risk weights in credit risk formulas were to be based on modern credit risk and banks’ internal measures
D
It was ruled out that the Tier 1 capital was necessary for the preservation of maintenance, while Tier 2 capital was to be used for the recapitalization of a financial institution in resolution and decrease the level of failures on the depositors