
Explanation:
The Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) is a regulatory requirement under the Basel III framework, designed to ensure that banks hold enough high-quality liquid assets to survive a severe liquidity disruption over a 30-day period. The LCR is calculated as the ratio of a bank's High Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA) to its total net cash outflows over the next 30 days. A ratio of 100% or more indicates that the bank has enough liquid assets to meet its short-term obligations, even in a severe liquidity stress scenario. In this case, the Bank of Salzburg's LCR of 152% suggests that it has more than enough liquid assets to survive a 30-day liquidity disruption.
Choice A is incorrect. The liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) is a short-term liquidity measure designed to ensure that banks can withstand a 30-day stress scenario, not a full year. Therefore, an LCR of 152% does not imply that the bank could withstand liquidity disruptions for one year.
Choice B is incorrect. While the LCR is indeed a measure of short-term liquidity, it specifically pertains to a 30-day stress scenario as per Basel III regulations. An LCR of 152% does not indicate that the bank could survive liquidity disruptions for 60 days without additional measures.
Choice D is incorrect. The LCR's purpose is to ensure that banks have enough high-quality liquid assets to survive significant cash outflows over a period of 30 days under stressed conditions, not just for 15 days.
Things to Remember
Ultimate access to all questions.
No comments yet.
Q.2358 Berthold Bruhne, a risk manager for the bank of Salzburg, was attending a board meeting where he presented the results of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) calculation. According to him, the bank’s LCR stood at 152% as of December 31st, 2016, safely above the required minimum. His conclusion was that the bank could survive liquidity disruptions in the next:
A
1 year
B
60 days
C
30 days
D
15 days