
Explanation:
The transition from Basel II to Basel II.5 primarily results in an increase in the capital charges for market risk. This is because Basel II.5 introduces enhancements to the market risk framework, which include the incorporation of stressed Value-at-Risk (VaR) and the incremental risk charge (IRC). These enhancements aim to capture the risk of mark-to-market losses on the trading book due to changes in market conditions. As a result, banks are required to hold more capital against market risk to absorb potential losses, leading to an increase in capital charges for market risk. This is particularly relevant for large banks like Cosomora Bank, which have a significant trading book.
Choice A is incorrect. The transition from Basel II to Basel II.5 primarily impacts the capital charges for market risk, not credit risk. While Basel II.5 does introduce some changes in the calculation of credit risk, it is not the primary focus of this regulatory update.
Choice B is incorrect. Similar to Choice A, this option incorrectly focuses on credit risk instead of market risk. Furthermore, under Basel II.5 framework, there isn't a general reduction in capital charges for credit risk; rather it introduces more sophisticated and sensitive measures for
Ultimate access to all questions.
Q.2348 Cosomora Bank from Eindhoven, in the Netherlands, is one of the largest European banks with a large trading book. The bank has been under Basel II and is currently in the later stages of Basel II.5 implementation. What will be the main effect of shifting from Basel II to Basel II.5?
A
Capital charges for credit risk will increase.
B
Capital charges for credit risk will be reduced.
C
Capital charges for market risk will increase.
D
Sweeping changes in liquidity measurement techniques.
No comments yet.