
Explanation:
The correct answer is A.
A deposit is typically considered a short-term fund. However, regulatory authorities allow for a different classification under certain conditions. If there is evidence that deposits can remain stable over a longer period, then 50% of these deposits can be treated as long-term funds. This is because the stability of these funds over time reduces the liquidity risk for the bank, allowing it to rely on these funds for longer-term obligations. Therefore, in the context of liquidity reporting, these deposits can be considered as long-term funds.
Choice B is incorrect. A banking institution cannot categorize deposits as long-term funds if their stability is uncertain. Long-term funds are typically stable and reliable sources of funding that can be expected to remain in place over a longer time horizon.
Choice C is incorrect. The contribution of the deposits to the bank's overall funding does not determine whether they can be classified as long-term funds. It's the stability and predictability of these funds that matter, not their proportion in the bank's total funding.
Choice D is incorrect. As explained above, a banking institution would be justified in categorizing 50% of its deposit funds as long-term if it is evident that they can remain relatively stable over time (choice A). Therefore, 'None of the above' cannot be correct.
Things to Remember
Ultimate access to all questions.
No comments yet.
Q.4065 How various specific types of cashflow are treated is an essential question in liquidity reporting. Under what circumstance should a bank treat 50% of deposit funds as long-term funds?
A
If it is evident that they can remain relatively stable over time
B
If their stability is uncertain
C
If they contribute to the highest portion of the bank’s funding
D
None of the above