Explanation:
SVB experienced a significant growth in assets from $71 billion to over $211 billion between 2019 and 2021. Despite this rapid expansion, it was not brought under heightened supervisory or regulatory scrutiny. Critical deficiencies in the bank’s governance, liquidity, and interest rate risk management were not appreciated or addressed adequately. This lack of oversight was a key factor contributing to SVB’s eventual failure.
A is Incorrect because SVB’s board of directors and senior management failed to effectively oversee and mitigate the risks inherent in the bank’s business model and growth strategy. They did not fully appreciate the vulnerabilities of their concentrated business model and reliance on uninsured deposits, which left the bank acutely exposed to rising interest rates and a slowdown in the technology sector.
B is incorrect as the Federal Reserve did not consistently rate SVB’s governance and risk management practices as poor. In fact, SVB was rated satisfactory in terms of management for both the holding company and the bank from 2017 through 2021, despite observations of
Ultimate access to all questions.
Q.5555 Regarding the risk management practices at Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) prior to its failure, which of the following statements is correct?
A
SVB’s board of directors and senior management were highly proactive in identifying and mitigating risks associated with the bank’s rapid growth and investment strategies.
B
The Federal Reserve consistently rated SVB’s governance and risk management practices as poor, leading to frequent and rigorous regulatory interventions.
C
Despite its rapid growth, SVB was not subject to enhanced supervisory or regulatory standards, and its risk management deficiencies were not adequately addressed.
D
SVB was known for its robust internal liquidity stress testing, which accurately predicted and mitigated the risks that led to the bank’s failure.
No comments yet.