
Explanation:
Vasicek's Model is the appropriate methodology to be associated with regulatory capital calculation under Basel II standards. It applies a one-factor Gaussian copula model to estimate the probability of default over a specified time horizon, making it suitable for Credit VaR calculations for regulatory requirements.
A is incorrect. A multifactor Gaussian copula model focusing on time-until-recovery is not typically associated with regulatory capital calculation for Credit VaR, as time-to-default is the primary concern.
C is incorrect. Credit Risk Plus does not use variance-covariance approaches; instead, it adopts procedures akin to insurance for calculating expected and unexpected losses from defaults, tailored for credit risk and not market fluctuations.
D is incorrect. Historical simulation for Credit VaR should involve the use of transition matrices and consider credit correlations, as these are critical for capturing the nature of credit risk.
Things to Remember
Ultimate access to all questions.
Q.6024 A junior risk analyst at a bank is tasked with identifying methods to calculate Credit VaR for regulatory capital under Basel II standards. Which methodology should the analyst correctly associate with this task?
A
A multifactor Gaussian copula model
B
Vasicek's Model
C
Credit Risk Plus
D
Historical simulation
No comments yet.