Explanation:
In risk management, a regression hedge allocates risk weight consistent with the slope coefficient or beta of the regression. Conversely, a reverse regression hedge modifies weight inversely based on the computed regression beta, leading to differences in risk distribution and exposure management.
A is Incorrect. Both result in different impacts on yields proportionally, but neither consistently ignores weight adjustments.
C is Incorrect. Risk weight contrasts significantly depending on whether hedge employs reverse regression methodology.
D is Incorrect. Misunderstands regression effects; both reconcile current positions rather than redefine them completely.
Things to Remember:
Ultimate access to all questions.
No comments yet.
Q.6514 In the context of hedging portfolios using regression techniques, how does the approach to managing risk vary between a typical regression hedge and a reverse regression hedge?
A
Regression hedge diminishes risk weight by undersampling yields, reverse regression has no effect on risk weight.
B
Regression supports allocating risk weight based on regression beta; reverse regression inversely adjusts risk weight.
C
Both regression hedge and reverse regression hedge distribute risk weight proportionately alike.
D
Regression hedge implies preserving all prior risk exposures, whereas reverse regression modifies them completely.