
Explanation:
Filtered Historical Simulation (FHS) is designed to address a key weakness of standard historical simulation: its assumption of constant volatility. FHS uses a time-varying volatility model, such as GARCH, to capture the dynamic nature of volatility in financial markets.
The FHS process generally involves these steps:
By adjusting historical returns based on a time-varying volatility model before resampling, FHS generates simulated future returns that are more reflective of current market conditions than those produced by standard historical simulation.
Why the other options are incorrect:
B: Simply reordering returns does not account for the magnitude of volatility changes. FHS explicitly models and adjusts for changing volatility.
C: This describes a form of censoring or truncation of the data, which is not what FHS does. FHS aims to model the entire distribution, including the tails, more accurately.
D: While standardizing returns is a step in FHS, it's not the complete picture. The key is that the standardization uses time-varying volatility estimates, and the resampled data is then scaled by the current volatility, not the historical standard deviation.
Ultimate access to all questions.
No comments yet.
Q.6433 Which of the following most closely characterizes the role of filtered historical simulation in estimating risk?
A
It fits a time-varying volatility model (e.g., GARCH) and then adjusts historical returns before resampling, reflecting evolving market conditions.
B
It reorders past returns chronologically to match any short-term volatility changes but leaves correlation unaltered.
C
It discards all returns that fall outside a user-defined confidence interval, ensuring that the final distribution is free of extreme tail events.
D
It transforms each asset’s average return into a standardized zero mean but leaves the standard deviation fixed at its historical level.