Explanation:
Even if the overall forecasted tracking error matches the mandate's target, significant over-budgeting or overweighting in specific sectoral themes (compensated by offsets or underweights in other areas) can signify that the portfolio manager is taking concentrated, potentially unintended active risks.
This behavior constitutes a potential deviation from the established investment strategy or style drift, which needs to be carefully investigated by the risk management unit. Therefore, the Chief Risk Officer should view this as a potential mandate breach or unintended risk exposure, rather than ignoring it just because the aggregate tracking error aligns with the target.
Ultimate access to all questions.
Q.75 Allegro Investments, a renowned investment management firm, sticks to a rigorous risk monitoring process. Recently, their Risk Management Unit (RMU) found out that one portfolio manager is generating a forecasted level of tracking error, which aligns perfectly with the target established by the mandate. However, the same manager is found to be significantly over budget in specific sectoral themes with offsets in other areas. As the Chief Risk Officer at Allegro Investments, how should you assess this situation?
A
The situation is not problematic since the overall forecasted tracking error is aligned with the target.
B
The overspending in specific sectors is a matter of the manager's discretion and should not be intervened.
C
The over-budget scenario in specific sectors indicates potential deviations from the established investment strategy.
D
This situation suggests that the risk forecasting model is not functioning correctly.
No comments yet.