
Explanation:
Without a netting agreement, the credit exposure is the sum of the positive market values (since negative values represent a liability to the firm, not an exposure): Credit exposure without netting =
With a netting agreement, the credit exposure is the maximum of the sum of all market values and zero: Credit exposure with netting =
The improvement in credit exposure is the difference between the exposure without netting and the exposure with netting:
Improvement = $370 - 25 = 345$.
Ultimate access to all questions.
Q.44 ATC, a seasoned derivative maker, has nine contracts with a counterparty, all transacted in Sydney, Australia. The contracts have current market values of 120, 85, -65, -50, 80, -90, 75, 10, and -140. At present, ATC does not have a legally binding netting agreement with the counterparty. By how much would ATC’s current credit exposure to this counterparty improve if it had a legally enforceable netting agreement with the said counterparty?
A
0
B
25
C
345
D
330
No comments yet.