Explanation:
The correct answer is D.
A stress test that assumes an equity market crash of 30% applied to individual counterparties is particularly useful for identifying vulnerabilities within the counterparty portfolio. It highlights which counterparties are most exposed to such an event and helps the bank estimate potential losses from those specific counterparties under the stress scenario.
Choice A is incorrect because stress testing results are generally used to determine capital buffers (economic capital) rather than to set aside accounting provisions, which are typically based on expected losses rather than stressed scenarios.
Choice B is incorrect. While a stress test might show which counterparties are riskier under a specific scenario (a 30% equity crash), it does not provide a comprehensive ranking of all counterparties from least to most risky across all types of risks.
Choice C is incorrect because stress tests are what-if scenarios used to evaluate the impact of potential events, not predictive tools to forecast when an event will actually occur.
Ultimate access to all questions.
Q.1997 The Bank of Bafisa conducts a stress test where it assumes an equity market crash of 30%. The bank applies a stress test to each of its counterparties. How best would such a stress test benefit the bank?
A
It would allow the bank to set aside sufficient provisions in its balance sheet.
B
The bank would be able to rank all its counterparties in order of risk, from the least risky to the riskiest.
C
The bank would be able to estimate when the next equity crash would occur in the future.
D
The bank would be able to identify the counterparties that would be of concern in such a stress event and estimate potential losses with respect to a counterparty.
No comments yet.