
Explanation:
In this case, an institution is in debt to its counterparty and is still legally obliged to settle this amount (they cannot walk away from the transaction or transactions except in specific cases). Hence, from a valuation perspective, the position appears essentially unchanged. An institution does not gain or lose from their counterparty’s default in this case.
Ultimate access to all questions.
Q.1929 In financial contracts, credit exposure is a critical concept that is determined by the effective value of the contract being either positive or negative. Suppose a credit event has transpired and the contract's value is negative. What does this scenario imply?
A
the institution is in debt and is legally obliged to settle this amount.
B
the institution is owed by a counterparty, who is legally obliged to settle the amount.
C
the institution is not legally obliged to settle its counterparty’s debt.
D
the institution is under financial distress and the contract should be terminated.
No comments yet.