
Explanation:
In taking a speculative stance, the portfolio manager would assume the role of the protection seller, profiting from the premiums received during the life of the CDS. As creditworthiness improves, the likelihood of a credit event decreases, potentially resulting in retained premiums without a payout obligation.
B is incorrect. Engaging in a Total Return Swap as the receiver of total returns is largely a market risk position. Though influenced by credit risk, it is not a pure credit improvement bet.
C is incorrect. Purchasing a tranche of a Synthetic CDO requires an investment tied to layered credit risk exposures, not allowing for direct speculation on the credit improvement of a single reference entity.
D is incorrect. Buying protection with an Add-up Basket CDS anticipates credit worsening rather than improvement and hence is contrary to the manager's speculative direction.
Ultimate access to all questions.
Q.6064 Exploring the use of credit derivatives for strategic purposes beyond mere protection, a portfolio manager contemplates a speculative position on the creditworthiness of a reference entity. Anticipating an improvement in the entity's credit standing, they aim to choose an instrument that could yield profits from this positive credit event. Among the credit derivatives available, which one would allow the manager to potentially profit from an improvement in the reference entity's credit quality?
A
Selling protection using a single-name Credit Default Swap (CDS).
B
Entering into a Total Return Swap (TRS) as the receiver of the total returns.
C
Purchasing a tranche of a Synthetic Collateralized Debt Obligation (CDO).
D
Buying protection using an Add-up Basket CDS.
No comments yet.