Ultimate access to all questions.
Explanation:
The correct outcome in this situation is that the bank has collateral worth $95 million, thus reducing its unsecured credit exposure to $5 million. This is because the collateral agreement stipulates that each party must post collateral equal to the value of the transactions to the other side at the end of the cure period, which was 10 days earlier. At that time, the value of transactions was $95 million. Therefore, the bank would be secured for $95 million of the $100 million outstanding, leaving an unsecured credit risk of $5 million.
A is incorrect. This outcome would only be possible if there were no collateral agreement in place, which contradicts the scenario provided.
C is incorrect. The bank's exposure is not zero because the collateral posted covers only $95 million of the $100 million outstanding, leaving a gap of $5 million unsecured.
D is incorrect. There's no indication in the scenario that excess collateral was posted or that the counterparty would return excess collateral during a default, especially given the nature of the collateral agreement described.
No comments yet.
Q.6213 In light of understanding the collateral impact on Credit Valuation Adjustment (CVA) calculations for derivatives, consider a situation where a bank and its counterparty have entered into a two-way collateral agreement with a zero-threshold. The bank has multiple derivative transactions with the counterparty over a stipulated time. The cure period is 10 days. On a particular simulation, the value of outstanding transactions to the bank at time T is $100 million, and the value 10 days earlier is $95 million. The counterparties have also agreed that collateral will be posted equal to the value of the transactions to the other side at the end of the cure period. Given this scenario, which of the following outcomes is possible if the counterparty defaults at time T?
A
The bank is an unsecured creditor for the entire $100 million as no collateral is posted.
B
The bank has collateral worth $95 million, reducing its unsecured credit exposure to $5 million.
C
The bank's exposure is zero, assuming the collateral completely covers the outstanding transaction value.
D
The counterparty returns the excess collateral, leading to no losses for the bank.