
Explanation:
A is correct. Distance to Default (DtD) approximates the number of standard deviations to reach the default threshold; thus, the higher the DtD, the least likely to default.
DtD can be simplified by reducing the forward time periods to 1 (t=1) and minimizing the drift factors that tend to be small (assumed to equal 0) over one period to yield:
Using this formula results in:
DtD for Company P =
DtD for Company Q =
DtD for Company R =
Q is least likely to default; R is in the middle; P is most likely to default.
Ultimate access to all questions.
No comments yet.
| Company | P | Q | R |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market value of assets (EUR million) | 100 | 150 | 250 |
| Face value of debt (EUR million) | 60 | 100 | 160 |
| Annual volatility of asset values | 10.0% | 7.0% | 8.0% |
Using the information above with the assumption that a zero-coupon bond maturing in 1 year is the only liability for each company, and the approximation formula of the distance to default, what is the correct ranking of the counterparties, from most likely to least likely to default?
A
P; R; Q
B
Q; P; R
C
Q; R; P
D
R; Q; P