
Explanation:
Option B is correct. The Basel framework explicitly states that exceptions fall into different categories (e.g., basic integrity of the model, model accuracy, bad luck, intra-day trading). Regulators are more likely to apply penalties when exceptions are driven by poor model accuracy or integrity. Calculating interest rate risk based on the "median duration of the bonds" is a severe model deficiency and oversimplification that fails to capture the actual sensitivity of the portfolio, leading directly to inaccurate VaR estimates.
Options A and C are incorrect because they describe unforeseen market movements ("bad luck" or extreme events). Supervisors may not automatically penalize a bank if the exceptions were caused by sudden market crises that a standard VaR model is not expected to foresee without stress testing.
Option D is incorrect because it describes an operational risk event, not market risk.
Ultimate access to all questions.
No comments yet.
A
A large move in interest rates occurs in conjunction with a small move in correlations.
B
The bank’s model calculates interest rate risk based on the median duration of the bonds in the portfolio.
C
A sudden market crisis in an emerging market, which leads to losses in the equity positions in that country.
D
A sudden devastating earthquake that causes major losses in the bank’s key area of operation.