
Explanation:
The value of a forward contract to a party holding a short position at expiration is indeed equal to the value to the long party multiplied by -1. This is because the short party has agreed to sell the underlying asset at a predetermined price, known as the forward price. If the spot price of the asset at expiration is higher than the forward price, the short party incurs a loss, while the long party makes a gain. Conversely, if the spot price is lower than the forward price, the short party makes a gain, while the long party incurs a loss. Therefore, the value of the contract to the short party is the negative of the value to the long party.
Choice A is incorrect. The value of a forward contract to the short party at expiration is not valueless. It depends on the difference between the spot price and the forward price at expiration.
Choice C is incorrect. This statement contradicts how a short position in a forward contract works. The value to the short party would be negative if the spot price of the underlying exceeds the forward price, not positive.
Choice D is incorrect. The value of a forward contract to a short party at expiration does not equal 1 divided by the value of the long party. This choice seems to confuse some concepts related with financial derivatives and does not accurately describe how this calculation should be made.
Q.3520 Which of the following statements is correct regarding the value of a forward contract to a short party at expiration?
The value of the forward contract is:
A
Valueless.
B
Equal to the value to the long party multiplied by -1.
C
Positive if the spot price of the underlying exceeds the forward price.
D
Equal to 1 divided by the value of the long party.
No comments yet.